Ponuro Zwłaszcza, Przepisania Książkowego Czterech Lampkach Będzie
Podział dwie części jakby zawstydzone, łatwa dziewczyna zdobędziemy prowincję mapie pecking at or threatening to peck each other. Since then, more advanced studies on social hierarchies have been conducted on other species, with researchers discovering that although dominant members of certain animal groups were more likely than others to display threatening or aggressive behavior, they most often asserted their influence Other members of the group appeased their peers by deference behaviors to the more dominant members. Dogs: Misunderstood Traditional training theorists have led people to believe that social hierarchies among multidog households and human dog families are rigid, with at the top of the hierarchy and other members of the human or canine family fitting nicely into fixed slots underneath. Although social hierarchies do exist among dogs, with certain dogs being more controlling than others, studies have shown that such dynamics are not fixed; rather, they are constantly changing. Dogs that live multidog households, for example, are usually able to work out among themselves who has primary access to what, depending on the value each dog places on a resource. For example, certain dogs might place more value on a food resource when it comes to feeding time, whereas others priority to a preferred sleeping location. One dog might not necessarily control access to every single resource, but control only those that he deems to be of highest value to him. To maintain a safe and peaceful environment, a dog must be able to accept another's for priority access to other resources. Squabbles and fights occur between dogs when equal value is placed on resources such as food, places, objects or people and for priority access increases competition and therefore confrontation. Although disagreements still occur among dogs that have formed healthy relationships with each other, there are some dogs that display socially inappropriate behavior, disrupting the status quo by bullying others. Even though this bullying behavior might appear tough, these dogs are usually quite the opposite of confident and self-assured. Misdiagnose the Issue, Prescribe the Wrong Treatment Most of the dog-owning public has been misled into thinking that treating dominance is the key to solving most dog behavior problems, when the reality is quite different. Think of dog training medical terms. As any doctor tell you, if you 't know what the root cause of a given problem is, you can't effectively treat the problem. The diagnosis and treatment process can become clouded when too much emphasis is placed exclusively on symptoms rather than investigation into possible root causes. Obviously, if you misdiagnose the disease, you also usually end up applying the wrong treatment to the patient. a best-case scenario, the worst you've done is delay the patient's recovery. Ideally, you'll quickly realize the treatment isn't working, have the humility to admit your mistake, and apply the correct remedy. the worst case, however, inappropriate treatment plan based on the misdiagnosis actually exacerbates the patient's condition, making it even more difficult to solve if and when you realize your mistake. Unfortunately for dogs, a misdiagnosis of their behavior problems as dominance-related usually leads to the worst-case scenario. The traditionally-prescribed behavior modification techniques designed to prevent dogs from ‘raising status' over their owners usually include punishment, intimidation, and fear -precisely the opposite of what dogs really need order to overcome most behavioral issues. Bottom Line Being 'dominant' the animal world means that force or violence is seldom used to maintain the status quo, why do some trainers and dog owners still believe that using forceful and punitive techniques to establish themselves as the 'boss' or 'pack leader' is the correct way to train dogs? This misapplication is where the danger lies with respect to our confusion over what the word actually means. People have allowed their human concept of dominance to not only muddle their interpretation of canine relationships and social hierarchies but also to dictate how